Westernising African Feminist Epistemology

Author:

Hayes Catherine1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Sunderland, UK

Abstract

This chapter serves as a mechanism of recognising and acknowledging the illegitimacy of historic and traditional western approaches to narratives of African feminist epistemology. These approaches have engendered lenses of perspective which are irrefutably skewed by colonialism and whose address is warranted in ensuring both a means of learning about the end of an era and the prospect of a more authentically framed future framed, shaped, and determined from within African culture and context by those. To undertake this acknowledgement and recognition is one of the first and much belated to framing steps in ensuring that the articulation of truth lies best with those whose lived truths they are, rather than any tokenistic perceptions of them, consequently articulated through Western lenses of perspective.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference46 articles.

1. Local and Transnational Identity, Positionality and Knowledge Production in Africa and the African Diaspora

2. Epistemic Injustice, Epistemic Paralysis, and Epistemic Resistance: A (Feminist) Liberatory Approach to Epistemology. Kritike: An Online;K. L. R. P.Agra;The Journal of Philosophy,2020

3. Akinkunmi, K. (2021). An Analysis of “Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World” by Arturo Escobar. Sustinere—The University of Toronto's Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(1), 64-71.

4. African feminism, activism and decolonisation: the case of Alimotu Pelewura

5. Berenstain, N. (2016). Epistemic exploitation.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3