Affiliation:
1. University of Sunderland, UK
Abstract
This chapter serves as a mechanism of recognising and acknowledging the illegitimacy of historic and traditional western approaches to narratives of African feminist epistemology. These approaches have engendered lenses of perspective which are irrefutably skewed by colonialism and whose address is warranted in ensuring both a means of learning about the end of an era and the prospect of a more authentically framed future framed, shaped, and determined from within African culture and context by those. To undertake this acknowledgement and recognition is one of the first and much belated to framing steps in ensuring that the articulation of truth lies best with those whose lived truths they are, rather than any tokenistic perceptions of them, consequently articulated through Western lenses of perspective.
Reference46 articles.
1. Local and Transnational Identity, Positionality and Knowledge Production in Africa and the African Diaspora
2. Epistemic Injustice, Epistemic Paralysis, and Epistemic Resistance: A (Feminist) Liberatory Approach to Epistemology. Kritike: An Online;K. L. R. P.Agra;The Journal of Philosophy,2020
3. Akinkunmi, K. (2021). An Analysis of “Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World” by Arturo Escobar. Sustinere—The University of Toronto's Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(1), 64-71.
4. African feminism, activism and decolonisation: the case of Alimotu Pelewura
5. Berenstain, N. (2016). Epistemic exploitation.