Affiliation:
1. Adamas University, India
2. O.P. Jindal Global University, India
Abstract
The 2014 Google Spain lawsuit was a major European Court ruling. It indicated that online name searches yield personal information. Google and other search engine operators must remove or prevent search results that breach privacy rights. The “right to forget” lets users remove their personal information from search engine results. Your internet privacy isn't completely protected. Technology changes quickly, making it hard for laws to stay up. The right to be forgotten is criticized for its deceptive nomenclature and inconsistent application. European websites may remove information, but non-European sites (like the US) may not. This right may also limit free speech. The chapter discusses the “right to be forgotten” from the new GDPR perspective. They are testing whether this right gives internet users more control over their data. It conflicts with privacy and free speech. It's considerably difficult since private firms, whose major objective is to make money, have a say, raising problems about our rights.
Reference64 articles.
1. Aidinlis, S. (2020). The Right to Be Forgotten as a Fundamental Right in the UK After Brexit (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3554625). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3554625
2. Designing privacy-friendly data repositories: a framework for a blockchain that follows the GDPR
3. REMEDIES AGAINST THE EU INSTITUTIONS AFTER LISBON: AN ERA OF OPPORTUNITY?
4. The Right to be Forgotten in the Digital Age
5. Andrus, M. T. (2016a). The Right to be Forgotten in America: Have Search Engines Inadvertently Become Consumer Reporting Agencies? Business Law Today, 1–4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/businesslawtoday.2016.05.06