Forms of Bias in Online Reviews and Their Implications for Management of Customer Knowledge

Author:

Skotis Apostolos1ORCID,Livas Christos2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Piraeus, Greece

2. University of Patras, Greece

Abstract

This study conducts a systematic literature review to identify forms of user behavioral bias, affecting the generation of content, evaluation patterns, and the impact of online reviews. Furthermore, it indicates the resulting implications for organizations' management of customer knowledge. The authors collected studies dating from 2009 to 2023 in Scopus, where a high dimensionality of bias definitions is observed. As a result of this review, a series of thematic distinctions is proposed, distinguishing sentiment and evaluation asymmetries, motivational factors, as well as on-platform effects that can amplify, adjust, or create biased behaviors. The authors draw analogies with cognitive bias literature regarding cognitive limitations, preconceptions and motives, and contextual adaptations that lead to biased behaviors. Suggested methods and analyses aiming at bias understanding and mitigation are also presented in detail. The authors provide a comprehensive framework of bias-centered management in online review platforms, incorporating customer knowledge flows and practices to monitor and address bias effects.

Publisher

IGI Global

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3