Affiliation:
1. GLA University, India
2. Bennett University, India
3. The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, India
Abstract
This chapter investigated if communication between the European Union, the United States, and Russia has changed since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. A comparative mixed-method approach based on the philosophies of liberalism, realism, and social constructivism has been employed to achieve this. Frequency analysis and ideological analysis of speeches and declarations made by influential people from the European Union and the United States were combined to create the mixed technique. The key finding of this chapter is that since the commencement of the conflict, the communication between both players has evolved from a liberal stance to a more realistic standpoint. The fundamental contrast between the actors was evident before the conflict when the European Union adopted a predominantly liberal strategy while the United States adopted a mixed approach of liberalism and realism. The shifting nature of the world might explain the altered communicative strategy.
Reference24 articles.
1. 12. Social constructivism
2. BaylisJ.SmithS.OwensP. (2020). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.
3. The European Union as a Global Actor
4. Burchill, S. (2013). Liberalism. In A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, & J. TRUE (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/9781403948656
5. Cameron, F., & Teltschik, H. (2008). Eu-Russia Relations (Prospects for EU-Russia Relations, pp. 5–6). Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep10065.7