Online Participation and Digital Divide

Author:

Aikins Stephen K.1,Chary Meena1

Affiliation:

1. University of South Florida, USA

Abstract

This chapter examines whether government officials’ deployment of resources to broaden Internet access and participation is influenced by officials’ communication preferences and socioeconomic factors. The concern that the Internet explosion has alienated and marginalized some citizens from the democratic process and civic life has generated intellectual debate and led governments and other sectors to take measures to bridge the gap created by the digital divide. Although several studies have been conducted on the subject, few are yet to be done on the influence of government officials’ communication preferences and socioeconomic factors on resource deployment to broaden access and participation. Drawing on the theories of technological diffusion and determinism, as well as developmental and democratic theories, we argue that officials’ communication preferences and socioeconomic factors will be important in broadening Internet access and participation. Survey data, local government Web site contents and census data were analyzed. Results reveal that officials are not eager to commit resources to activities that broaden access and participation because they generally prefer to communicate with citizens via traditional channels. In addition, the sizes of the elderly and Black population, as well as the relative affluence of cities, do influence the presence of deliberative features on city Web sites.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference74 articles.

1. Anttiroiko, A. (2004). Towards citizen-centered local e-government-the case of the city of Tempere. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Annals of cases on information technology (Vol. 6, pp. 371-385). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

2. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

3. Beamish, A. (1995). Communities online: Community based computer networks. Unpublished masters thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

4. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

5. Bellamy, C., & Taylor, J. (1998). Governing in the information age. Buckingham: Open University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3