Cyber-Attacks, Retaliation and Risk

Author:

Brown Cameron S. D.1

Affiliation:

1. Australian National University, Australia

Abstract

This chapter examines legal and technical issues that arise when considering strategic retaliatory countermeasures to cyber-attacks. Implications connected with endorsing techniques of active defense for nation-states are viewed alongside challenges faced by private entities. Proactive avenues for tackling cyber-security threats are evaluated and shortcomings within the international system of governance are analyzed. Retributive justice as a legal and philosophical concept is viewed through the lens of customary international law pertaining to use of force and self-defense. Difficulties in adapting rules governing kinetic warfare to instances of cyber-conflict are elucidated. The danger of executing counterstrikes for private entities is explained with reference to cross-border dilemmas, conflict of laws, and risks stemming from civil, criminal, and also administrative liability. Protocols for safeguarding anonymity are observed and the problem of attribution is illustrated. Costs and benefits associated with adopting methods of active defense are presented and solutions to avoid accountability failure are recommended.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference193 articles.

1. Acquiring high tech crime tools. (2006). High Tech Crime Brief, 13. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/A/B/C/%7bABCFCBC4-541A-4ED8-822E-3A0C3B082644%7dhtcb013.pdf

2. Alexis, A. (2013, April 9). Debate brewing over whether companies should strike back at their cyber attackers. Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bna.com/debate-brewing-whether-n17179873246/

3. APT30 and the mechanics of a long-running cyber espionage operation. (2015, April 15). FireEye Threat Intelligence Special Report. Retrieved from https://www2.fireeye.com/rs/fireye/images/rpt-apt30.pdf

4. Baker, S. (2012, September 19). Rethinking cybersecurity, retribution, and the role of the private sectors. Steptoe. Retrieved from http://www.steptoecyberblog.com/2012/09/19/rethinking-cybersecurity-retribution-and-the-role-of-the-private-sector/?

5. Baker, S. (2013, November 26). Hackback backers’ comeback? The Volokh Conspiracy. Retrieved from http://www.volokh.com/2013/11/26/hackback-backers-comeback/

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Offending, Victimization, Forensic Investigation, and Prevention of Cyberstalking;Developing Safer Online Environments for Children;2020

2. Offending, Victimization, Forensic Investigation, and Prevention of Cyberstalking;Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology;2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3