Affiliation:
1. Lander University, USA
Abstract
Professional development programs must have an organized process of evaluation, either formally or informally. The evaluation needs to be delivered in both micro and macro settings. In the micro setting, the evaluator monitors the overall atmosphere of the learning environment and the performance of the participants while training is taking place. In the macro setting, which consists of the teacher’s classroom, the evaluation needs to determine whether the teacher is actually using the knowledge gained during professional development to improve /impact student learning outcomes. In order for professional development to be effective, professional development programs should never be delivered and then forgotten. Further, locating funding and support are important due to the state of economic crisis and budget cuts. School districts have to look for creative ways to fund and support successful professional development programs. Some of these include developing technology resource centers, looking for federal and state funds, and looking toward individuals and corporations to help support and fund programs.
Reference20 articles.
1. Anderson, M. A. (2010). Solving the technology funding challenge--making a fresh start. Retrieved from www.homepage.mac.com/Maryalicea/Sites/Anderson/Anderson.html
2. Policies that support professional development in an era of reform.;L.Darling-Hammond;Kappan,2011
3. ICT teacher training: Evidence for multilevel evaluation from a national initiative
4. A primer for professional development.;L. M.Desimone;Kappan,2011
5. Fish, D., Koczera, N., & Valley, M. (1999). Introducing technology to the K-12 classroom. Retrieved from http://www.uri.edu/personal/dfis3368/fundsol.htm#top
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Teacher Education and Teacher Professional Development;Handbook of Research on Teacher Education and Professional Development;2017