Affiliation:
1. Oklahoma State University, USA
Abstract
Investment in transportation infrastructure is widely assumed to spur economic growth, a belief that persists among both the general public and government officials. However, research has provided inconsistent evidence to date, and many researchers believe that good transportation is a necessary but insufficient condition for regional growth. This study examines the issue from a different perspective than the majority of past research, using spatial regression techniques to explore the relationship between transportation quality and regional economic development at an intermediate spatial resolution. Using federal highway statistics on pavement roughness and bridge quality, this research examines the relationship between measurable results of transportation spending, as evidenced by better quality roads and bridges, and various indicators of economic health. This relationship is examined in the South-Central U.S. (Arkansas, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas) at the county level and uncovers moderate to weak regression coefficients overall but with notable spatial variations across the study area.
Reference45 articles.
1. Can Geographically Weighted Regressions Improve Regional Analysis and Policy Making?
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2009). Rough roads ahead, fix them now or pay for it later. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
3. Economic impact of highway bypasses.;S. J.Andersen;Transportation Research Record,1993
4. BanisterD.BerechmanJ. (2000). Transport investment and economic development. London, UK: UCL Press.
5. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth