Affiliation:
1. University of the Basque Country, Spain
Abstract
The proposals suggested so far can be can be classified in two different categories: on the one hand, NEMO solutions that consider MIPv6 as the base host mobility management protocol, and on the other hand, solutions that consider alternative base host mobility management protocols like SIP, LIN6, or HIP. Besides, a taxonomy on MIPv6 based NEMO protocols classifying them by considering which characteristics they aim to enhance is provided. It is important to point out that the selection of the base host mobility management protocol is fundamental to have as many demanded key features satisfied as possible by the NEMO protocol to be applied in the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) context.
Reference65 articles.
1. Arkko, J., Deverapalli, V., & Dupont F. (2004). Using IPsec to protect mobile IPv6 signaling between mobile nodes and home agents. IETF RFC 3776.
2. Arkko, J., Kempf, J., Zill, B., & Nikander, P. (2005). Secure network discovery. IETF RFC 3971.
3. Baldessari, R., Ernst, T., Festag, A., & Lenardi, M. (2009). IETF draft. draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02.
4. Baldessari, R., Festag, A., & Abeille, J. (2007a). NEMO meets VANET: A deployability analysis of network mobility in vehicular communications. International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST). Sophia. France.
5. Baldessari, R., Festag, A., & Lenardi, M. (2007b). C2C-C consortium requirements for usage of NEMO in VANETs. IETF draft, draft-baldessari-c2ccc-nemo-req-00.