Abstract Fault Tolerance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Abstract Fault Tolerance

Published: Issue: Volume: Page:57-67
ISSN:
Container-title:Innovations and Approaches for Resilient and Adaptive Systems
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Marcus Leo¹

Affiliation:

1. The Aerospace Corporation, USA

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of “pure fault tolerance”--when a system can fulfill its computational goal, even though some of its components do not fulfill theirs. This leads to a natural statement of the composition problem for a very general concept of architecture: to what extent are the properties of a system based on that architecture a function of the properties of the components? The author explores several variations on pure fault tolerance, none of which utilize fault detection or error correction.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference22 articles.

1. Aaronson, S., & Arkhipov, A. (2001). The computational complexity of linear optics. Retrieved from http://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/optics.pdf

2. Bacon, D. (2008). Self-correcting quantum computers (part II). Retrieved from http://scienceblogs.com/pontiff/2008/08/selfcorrecting_quantum_compute_1.php

3. Bernardeschi, C., Fantechi, A., & Simoncin, L. (1994). Formal reasoning on fault coverage of fault tolerant techniques: A case study. In K. Echtle, D. Hammer, & D. Powell (Eds.), Proceedings of the First European Dependable Computing Conference (LNCS 852, pp. 77-94).

4. Courcelle, B. (2011). Graph structure and monadic second-order logic, a language theoretic approach. Retrieved from http://www.labri.fr/perso/courcell/Book/TheBook.pdf

5. De Florio, V., & Blondia, C. (2008). A survey of linguistic structures for application-level fault tolerance. ACM Computing Surveys, 40(2), 6.