Affiliation:
1. Deakin University, Australia
Abstract
ID scanners are promoted as an effective solution to the problems of anti-social behavior and violence in many urban nighttime economies. However, the acceptance of this and other forms of computerized surveillance to prevent crime and anti-social behavior is based on several unproven assumptions. After outlining what ID scanners are and how they are becoming a normalized precondition of entry into one Australian nighttime economy, this chapter demonstrates how technology is commonly viewed as the key to preventing crime despite recognition of various problems associated with its adoption. The implications of technological determinism amongst policy makers, police, and crime prevention theories are then critically assessed in light of several issues that key informants talking about the value of ID scanners fail to mention when applauding their success. Notably, the broad, ill-defined, and confused notion of “privacy” is analyzed as a questionable legal remedy for the growing problems of überveillance.
Reference33 articles.
1. Australian Privacy Foundation. (2010). APF policy statement re- visual surveillance, including CCTV. Retrieved May 9, 2011, from http://www.privacy.org.au/Papers/CCTV-1001.html
2. What is Überveillance? (And What Should Be Done About It?)
3. Police reform and the problem of trust
4. Consuming security?
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献