Affiliation:
1. Fudan University, China
Abstract
E-government readiness is critical and fundamental to e-government success. This paper reviews and differentiates the definitions of e-readiness, e-government readiness and e-government maturity, and examines the literatures on current assessment practices to identify issues, controversies and problems. The chapter then proposes a bottom-up approach to develop a field-based E-government readiness assessment method and factors that could be usable and applicable for a specific local government with its own unique e-government priorities and goals, and then tests the approach in a city government in China and receives positive feedbacks. As a result of this new approach and methods, a set of specific readiness assessment factors, rather than predefined all-size-fits-all criteria, are derived. The method takes both qualitative and quantitative approaches, and collects both primary and secondary data.
Reference26 articles.
1. Accenture. (2003). eGovernment leadership report: The citizen’s view. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://www.accenture.com/us-en/Pages/insight-egovernment-2003-summary.aspx
2. E-Government Readiness Assessment Model
3. Prospects for e-government in Latin America: Satisfaction with democracy, social accountability and direct democracy.;D.Altman;International Review of Public Administration,2002
4. E-Government readiness index: A methodology and analysis
5. Bannister, F. (2003). Deep e-government. EGPA 2004 Annual Conference. Slovenia. Retrieved May 11, 2012, from http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar_url?hl=zh-CN&q=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.118.1451%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1gZi5rQWXIc-O-ggj9xs_mikCFEg&oi=scholarr&ei=XpOtT_rFPK2tiQeMyK3sCA&ved=0CBwQgAMoATAA