Affiliation:
1. Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany
Abstract
Business process models (BPM) are widely used for specification of software systems, as the basis for model driven software development. Hence, it is crucial to ensure that these BPMs fulfill the requirements they have to comply with. These requirements may originate from various domains. Many may be considered non-functional requirements. They are affecting privacy, security, as well as compliance or economic aspects. In order to avoid error-prone manual checking, automated checking techniques should be applied wherever possible. This requires expressing requirements in a formal manner. The common textual representations for such formal requirements are not well accepted in the modeling domain, since they are settled on a lower level of abstraction, compared to BPMs. In this chapter, the authors present the Business Application Modeler (BAM), which integrates formal requirement specification and automated checking with process modeling. On the one hand BAM supports different notations for process modeling. On the other hand a graphical notation, called G-CTL, for the formal specification of requirements is provided. G-CTL is based on temporal logic, and statements are expressed on the level of abstraction of the graphical process models. Furthermore BAM provides the ability to define selective views on process models. This allows complex domain specific annotations of processes as well as the assignment of responsibilities regarding functional domains. Moreover, BAM integrates into common requirements engineering processes.
Reference58 articles.
1. Anders, E. (2010). Modellierung und Validierung von Prozessmodellen auf Basis variabler Modellierungsnotationen und Validierungsmethoden als Erweiterung für Eclipse. Diploma thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität of Kiel.
2. Astesiano, E., & Reggio, G. (1993). A metalanguage for the formal requirement specification of reactive systems. In FME ’93: Proceedings of the First International Symposium of Formal Methods Europe on Industrial-Strength Formal Methods (pp. 110–128). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
3. Awad, A. (2007). BPMN-Q: A language to query business processes. In M. Reichert, S. Strecker, & K. Turowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Int’l Workshop Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures Concepts and Applications (pp. 115–128). Bonn, Germany: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
4. Barbacci, M. R., Ellison, R. J., Weinstock, C. B., & Wood, W. G. (2000). Quality attribute workshop participants handbook (Tech. Rep.). Defense Technical Information Center OAI-PMH Repository. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc? AD=ADA455616& Location=U2&doc= GetTRDoc.pdf
5. Basin, D., Doser, J., & Lodderstedt, T. (2003). Model driven security for process-oriented systems. In SACMAT ’03: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (pp. 100–109). New York, NY: ACM.