Quality-Driven Software Development for Maintenance

Author:

Dubielewicz Iwona1,Hnatkowska Bogumila1,Huzar Zbigniew1,Tuzinkiewicz Lech1

Affiliation:

1. Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland

Abstract

Software maintenance is sometimes considered as a special kind of activity that is separated from a software development process. Meanwhile, the opposite is true; maintenance should be taken into account from the beginning of the software development process. Because a model-based software development is the prevailing software development paradigm, the maintainability should be considered within models that arise in software development process. We claim that the quality of the models arising in the software development process has a positive influence on their maintainability: the higher quality of the models, the more effective maintainability activity. The background for our consideration is MDA approach, and the scope of the consideration is limited to perfective maintenance only. The set of so called 6C quality characteristics is assumed to define a quality of MDA-models. Our selection of 6C quality characteristics is justified by the fact that they are related to activities performed on models within the maintenance. To assess MDA-models in the context of the maintainability, we define checklists for the 6C characteristics. These checklists are used for derivation of some measures which are useful in checking to what scope a given characteristics is satisfied. The main advantage of the approach is its independence of the knowledge of future changes of user requirements that trigger perfective maintenance. In the chapter, we demonstrate a simple example of how to assess the quality of PIM-models that are the realization of the CIM-model. Additionally, we discuss how to select, for further development, the best PIM-model from the set of possible solution.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference46 articles.

1. Agarwal, R. (2005). Software development vs. software maintenance. Virginia Tech. Retrieved from http://www.irahul.com/workzone/pm/Software_Dev_vs_Maint.pdf

2. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). The goal question approach. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cs.umd.edu/pub/sel/papers/gqm.pdf

3. Bobkowska, A. (2009). Integrating quality criteria and methods of evaluation for software models. In J. Rech & C. Bunse (Eds,), Model-driven software development: Integrating quality assurance. Hershey, PA: IGI Global

4. No silver bullet.;F. P.Brooks;IEEE Computer,1987

5. Canfora, G., & Cimitile, A. (2000). Software maintenance. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.25.1678&rep

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3