Knowledge Markets and Collective Learning

Author:

Bremdal Bernt1,Korsvold Torbjørn2

Affiliation:

1. Narvik University College, Norway

2. SINTEF Technology and Society, Norway

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors argue that “Knowledge Markets” might be used as a term to describe how individuals can be engaged in a democratic process where their competence, background, and personal information resources are mobilized in full in a broad and non-biased process. The contribution of each individual is aggregated and averaged in a way the authors believe will yield more accurate results, personal involvement, and learning than traditional approaches to group efforts. Recent work on crowdsourcing (Surowiecki, 2004) highlights the strength of a collection of individuals over traditional organizational entities. This contribution will extend these principles to fit into an organizational setting. The chapter discusses how knowledge markets can create an arena for change. Moreover, it shows that if certain principles are observed desired effects could be achieved for relatively limited groups. The authors extend this to propose theories about collective learning and performance improvement. They further describe how the principles defined can help to meet some fundamental challenges related to petroleum activities such as drilling. The authors think that the Knowledge Market approach can serve as a model for designing IO arenas to increase collaboration, to improve shared problem solving, and make collective learning more effective. In all kinds of operations performance improvement is strongly related to learning. It is a cognitive ability that must be exercised and maintained through motivation, discipline, and other stimuli. Collective learning applies to the effort whereby a group of people detect threats or opportunities and learns how to take early advantage of this in order to assure change.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference52 articles.

1. Apache. (2011). Web server. Retrieved from http://httpd.apache.org/

2. So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making

3. Barsa, M., & Dana, D. A. (2011). Reconceptualizing NEPA to avoid the next preventable disaster. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 38(2). Retrieved from hhtp://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol38/iss2/2

4. Böhn, K. (2008). KnowledgeCraft proposal preparation. Workshop FHG AIAIS, Bonn, 31.1.2008

5. The HBS method;B. A.Bremdal;Norwegian: HBS metodikken. Basert på FAROS Metodebok for HAMP Business System) v1.1 juni 2001,2001

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Complexity in the oil and gas industry: a study into exploration and exploitation in integrated operations;Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity;2018-03-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3