Affiliation:
1. SINTEF Telecom and Informatics and IDI, NTNU, Oslo, Norway
Abstract
Many researchers have evaluated different parts of UML and have come up with suggestions for improvements to different parts of the language. This chapter looks at UML (version 1.3) as a whole, and contains an overview evaluation of UML and how it is supported in the modeling tool Rational Rose as a basis for creating models of high quality. The evaluation is done using a general framework for understanding quality of models and modeling languages in the information systems field. The evaluation is based on both practical experiences and evaluations of UML and Rational Rose made by others. Based on the evaluation, we conclude that, although being an improvement over its predecessors, UML still has many limitations and deficiencies. Also Rational Rose only partly supports the development of information system models of high quality, and provides too limited support for using different modeling techniques in concert within a larger methodological framework.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Finding a Structure: Evaluating Different Modelling Languages Regarding Their Suitability of Designing Agent-Based Models;Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Body, Motion and Behavior;2021
2. Evaluation of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the CORAS Modelling Language;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2018
3. Applications of SEQUAL;Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems;2012
4. Diagram Notations for Mobile Work Processes;Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing;2011
5. Evaluating formal properties of feature diagram languages;IET Software;2008