Affiliation:
1. University of Borås, Sweden & Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Belgium
Abstract
The authors study collaborative modeling by analyzing conversations and loud thinking during modeling sessions and the resulting models themselves. They identify the basic activities of the modeling teams on the social, pragmatic, semantic and syntactic levels and derive a schema for the pragmatic level. The authors’ main conclusion is that team-based modeling is largely a negotiation process. Drawing on these results the authors derive an architecture of a system that supports the distributed development of conceptual models.
Reference34 articles.
1. Group decision support systems.;M.Aiken;Review of Business,1995
2. The role of collaborative support to promote participation and commitment in software development teams
3. Bamber, E. M., Watson, R. T., & Hill, M. C. (1996). The effects of group support system technology on audit group decision-making. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(1), 122-134.
4. Integrated Support from Problem Structuring through to Alternative Evaluation Using COPE and V·I·S·A
5. The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems