Affiliation:
1. University of Plymouth, UK
2. University of Bournemouth, UK
Abstract
This chapter offers a framework for considering whether the Internet might be facilitating the evolution of e-representation. The chapter starts by considering the meaning of representation; it then considers what factors influence changes in the concept of representation. We argue that, potentially, the Internet may be facilitating a model of representation based not on the geographic constituency, but upon common interest. The chapter assesses the use of four Internet modalities by UK Members of Parliaments (MPs): websites, e-newsletters, weblogs, and social networking sites. We suggest that there is evidence of parallel e-representation, where MPs use the Internet to enhance their relationship with geographical constituents. We also find the basis for a separate form of e-representation based around the development of an e-constituency of those with shared policy interests. We suggest that by creating a more flexible model, e-representation may add significant nuance to the direct versus representative democracy debate.
Reference39 articles.
1. Parliament, Elected Representatives and Technology 1997–2005—Good in Parts?
2. UK elected representatives and their weblogs: First impressions.;C.Auty;Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives,2005
3. Birch, A. (1971). Representation. London, UK: Pall Mall Press. boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Retrieved April 25, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
4. The Constituency Work of Members of the Scottish Parliament and National Assembly for Wales: Approaches, Relationships and Rules
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献