Security Across Disparate Management Domains in Coalition MANETs

Author:

Srivatsa Mudhakar1,Agrawal Dakshi1,McDonald Andrew D.2

Affiliation:

1. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, USA

2. Roke Manor Research Ltd, UK

Abstract

Designing a coalition network for chaotic environments (e.g., responding to a large catastrophe) is challenging because such systems cannot rely on availability of a fixed communication or a security infrastructure. In such situations, a coalition may use Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANETs) to communicate and to extend its operational reach and tempo. In this scenario, bootstrapping security and networking protocols requires that networking protocols cannot assume full existence of operational security protocols and vice-versa. In this chapter, the authors outline a realistic bounded resource adversary model and examine bootstrapping problems in the physical & link layer and the routing layer with the goal of identifying new research challenges and novel solution methodologies. In particular, (i) the authors examine secure link key set up protocols at the physical & link layer that neither use computationally intensive PKI mechanisms nor assume pre-configured shared keys between nodes that belong to different coalition partners, (ii) identify new security issues owing to power saving intra-domain routing protocols that use sophisticated packet matching and forwarding mechanisms; in a coalition setting they also examine inter-domain routing protocols that preserve domain autonomy and yet permits scalable network monitoring and misbehavior detection, (iii) examine identity management issues in MANETs and outline a wireless fingerprinting approach to condone a malicious node from spoofing and forging one or more identities on the network.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference57 articles.

1. Alaettinoglu, C., Villamizar, C., Gerich, E., Kessens, D., Meyer, D., Bates, T., Karrenberg, D. & Terpstra, M. (1999). Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL). RFC 2622 (Proposed Standard), June 1999. Updated by RFC 4012.

2. Barbir, A., Murphy, S. & Yang, Y. (2006, October). Generic Threats to Routing Protocols. RFC 4593 (Informational).

3. Barros, J. H., & Rodrigues, M. R. D. (2006). Secrecy Capacity of Wireless Channels. In IEEE International Symposium on the Information Theory.

4. Benaloh, J. (1999). Dense Probabilistic Encryption. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/crypto/papers/dpe.ps

5. BoldyrevaA.GentryC.O’NeillA.YumD. H. (2007). Ordered multi-signatures and identity-based sequential aggregate signatures, with applications to secure routing. In 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security (pp. 276–285). New York.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3