The Limitation Argument, Part 1

Author:

Abstract

Chapter 10 deals with the anti-transfer crowd (ATC) tactic of limiting the reach of transfer to criminal court (CC), assuming its elimination proves unattainable. The ATC mission, here, is to limit the target of transfer, especially in terms of age, offense, and disposition. A common claim is that only older (typically 16 and 17) delinquents should be transfer eligible. Inasmuch as the vast majority of transfers involves youths of this age the claim is mostly moot. Another argument is that only violent and person-related crimes should be transferred. This Chapter emphasizes that the chronic offender, the most prevalent subject of transfer, would very likely be beyond transfer's reach under this formula, which was probably the ATC's goal. Finally, the ATC demands that transfer be limited to youths who “require” a sentence longer than that available to JC. Although this is a critical reason for transfer, it is far from the only/primary reason to transfer.

Publisher

IGI Global

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3