Affiliation:
1. Technical University of Crete, Greece
Abstract
To investigate the wellbeing factor within the urban context, the authors developed a methodological process for understanding and recreating the term “wellness” focusing on the public open spaces of the city. Using as case study the city of Chania, this research firstly proposes the assessment of four well-being indicators in specific areas of the city linking their effect on people's disposition and then uses the generated data for the redesign of public open spaces in terms of strengthening urban prosperity, with a comprehensive six-step methodology that combines participatory processes and methods based on GIS technologies. This chapter is structured into three main sections as follows: the first section elaborates on the research questions and justification of methods used, the second proceeds with the analysis of the proposed methodology while the third section highlights its overall assessment. Finally, some concluding remarks are expressed for further research.
Reference21 articles.
1. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
2. Carmona, M., Freeman, J., Rose, S., & Woolley, H. (2004). The Value of Public Space: How high-quality parks and public spaces create economic, social and environmental value. Retrieved from, https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118153706/http://www.cabe.org.uk/files/the-value-of-public-space.pdf (01-08-2021)
3. Centre for Urban Design and Mental Health (UD/MH). (2016). Mind the GAPS Framework: The Impact of Urban Design and Mental Health and Wellbeing. Retrieved from, https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/mind-the-gaps-framework.html
4. Defining and assessing walkability: a concept for an integrated approach using surveys, biosensors and geospatial analysis
5. Exploring the relationship between the smart-sustainable city, well-being, and urban planning: An analysis of current approaches in Europe
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献