Breastfeeding, Authority, and Genre

Author:

Lukowski Alison A.1,Sparby Erika M.2

Affiliation:

1. Christian Brothers University, USA

2. Northern Illinois University, USA

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with women's mis- or underrepresentation in knowledge creation, particularly when it comes to their bodies. In this chapter, the authors examine how Wikipedia's generic regulations determine that women's often experiential ethos is unwelcome on the site. Thus, women are often unable to construct knowledge on the “Breastfeeding” entry; their epistemological methods are ignored or banned by other contributors. This chapter also examines six breastfeeding-focused mommyblogs, proposing blogs as an alternative genre that welcomes women's ethos. However, the authors also recognize that such blogs are not a perfect epistemological paradigm. The chapter closes with an examination of the implications of this work for academic collaboration across fields and for women's agency.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference75 articles.

1. Anne. (2015a). Dispelling breastfeeding myths [Blog]. Retrieved from http://mythnomore.blogspot.com/

2. Anne. (2015b). Dispelling breastfeeding myths [Facebook page]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/DispellingBfMyths/

3. Blogs of Information: How Gender Cues and Individual Motivations Influence Perceptions of Credibility

4. Balit, S. (2007). Communication for isolated and marginalized groups. In Communication and sustainable development: Selected papers from the 9th UN roundtable on communication for development (pp. 101-122). New York: FAO UN Press.

5. Bernstein, R. (2015, May 1). PLOS ONE outs review, editor after sexist peer-review storm. Science Insider. Retrieved from http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2015/04/sexist-peer-review-elicits-furious-twitter-response

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Wikipedia gender gap: a scoping review;El Profesional de la información;2023-12-16

2. Wikipedia gender gap: a scoping review;El Profesional de la información;2023-12-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3