Affiliation:
1. St. Cloud State University, USA
2. Southwest Minnesota State University, USA
Abstract
This chapter presents and discusses a review and comparison of low-end 360-degree and extended reality (XR) practices. The goal of the chapter is to assist both technologically and organizationally with the ubiquitous acceptance of these two technologies as part of the move toward immersive teaching and learning. The chapter shares an overview of rather fluctuant terminology: 360-degree videos and images, virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality, extended reality, immersive teaching, and immersive learning. Fostering and accepting a standardized and understandable terminology is an important part of the application process of these technologies to enable immersive teaching and learning. Furthermore, this chapter will argue the importance of a low-end approach toward immersive teaching and learning due to constraints of various characters and as a part of the scalable construct of immersive teaching and learning in academic libraries and respectively on campus.
Reference28 articles.
1. Students' Perceptions of 360 Degree Virtual Tour-Based Historical Learning About The Cultural Heritage Area of The Kapitan and Al-Munawar Villages in Palembang City
2. 360-Degree Videos, VR Experiences and the Application of Education 4.0 Technologies in Malaysia for Exposure and Immersion
3. Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., & Weber, N. (2019). Educause Horizon report: 2019 Higher Education edition. Academic Press.
4. Design methodology for 360° immersive video applications: the case study of a cultural heritage virtual tour
5. Baumgartner, E. (2020). Virtual Reality and 360-Degree Video Use by Teachers: Implications for Teacher Professional Development. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/215937/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献