Affiliation:
1. Hunan University, China
2. University of Arizona, USA
Abstract
Students increasingly control their learning as university instructors shift away from lecture formats, courses are offered online, and the internet offers near infinite resources for student-controlled informal learning. Students typically make effective choices about learning, including what to learn, when to learn, and how to learn, but sometimes make less-than-optimal study choices, including trying to study while multi-tasking. Dividing attention among various tasks impairs both learning and learners' control over their learning because secondary tasks divert cognitive resources away from learning and metacognition. This chapter reviews recent studies explaining how dividing attention affects students' metacognition, including their assessments of their own learning and the study choices that they make. This chapter reviews the fundamentals of metacognition, describes the impact of dividing attention on the effectiveness of learners' metacognition, and provides suggestions about how to enhance the efficacy of metacognition when students' attentional resources are limited.
Reference165 articles.
1. Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure
2. Agrawal, A. J. (2016, Apr 20). What do social media algorithms mean for you? Forbes.https://www.forbes.com/sites/ajagrawal/2016/04/20/what-do-social-media-algorithms-mean-for-you/?sh=161bda4ea515
3. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States.http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
4. Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
5. Working Memory: Activation Limitations on Retrieval
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献