Abstract
This chapter is the position, synthesizing what the authors describe and what they mean and practice in Reciprocity with a set of rules and how it can be a tool in Social Sciences. Were there any problems with the Reciprocity in Research: Diversified Parable to Uniformity and Practicality Approach? How has the notion of Reciprocity been developed in various methods and circumstances by a diverse range of researchers, and how has it been given significance within the existing corpus of social science research methodology? Is it possible for the concept of Reciprocity to exist in more than one form and format in Social Research? How might using diverse viewpoints on the notion rethink how community engagement practitioners and researchers approach Reciprocity aspects in their discussions? Recognizing the numerous ways meaning is connected to and generated via the idea of Reciprocity is proposed in this chapter to understand the broader implications for community-engaged activity and study.
Reference42 articles.
1. Adamson, P. (2006). al-Kindi. Oxford University Press.
2. Defining Islamic Anthropology.;A. S.Ahmed;Rain,1984
3. AlatasF. (2018). Silencing as method: Leaving Malay studies out. Department of Malay Studies, National University of Singapore.
4. Applying Ibn Khaldūn
5. Silencing as Method: The Case of Malay Studies