Abstract
This chapter demonstrates the shifting nature of Reciprocity-in-Kind (RiK) as previously stated by Frankfurtian Criticalists and Feminists but focuses on ethical considerations. This chapter is divided into two sections. The first one discusses the transition from Western Christian Reciprocity to Reciprocity in research and development, then addresses this concept's breadth, utilizing the Becoming process of the Bioprospecting Paradigm. A critical point the authors would like to make in this chapter is whether or not Reciprocity-in-Kind has been phased out. At the very least, the vociferous nature of postcolonial texts establishes this. They reject this assertion; rather than bolstering their argument, they included some examples of Reciprocity.
Reference82 articles.
1. Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies
2. Introduction–indigenous studies: An appeal for methodological promiscuity;C.Andersen;Sources and methods in indigenous studies,2017
3. The plants of empire: Botanic gardens, colonial power and botanical knowledge.;Z.Baber;Journal of Contemporary Asia,2016
4. Barnes, T. (2006). Between Deduction and Dialectics: David Harvey on Knowledge. In David Harvey: A Critical Reader. Blackwell.
5. science and colonial expansion: the role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens