Affiliation:
1. SUNY Empire State College, USA
Abstract
This chapter is a reflection on practice that resulted in the incorporation of an active blended learning approach in courses which the author facilitates for transnational students. These courses were popular, received very favorable student evaluations, and seemed successful in delivering their learning goals. However, there was a growing realization that the dynamics of these courses could be enhanced and made more effective in terms of student engagement. There was also a concern that the “blending” in the course designations might be more of an administrative classification than a thoughtful combination of the best features of distance online learning and face-to-face instruction. The chapter details the author's reflection on practice in course design and facilitation. It reviews the identification of areas of concerns and missed opportunities in these learning environments. Finally, the chapter considers the implementation and result of actions taken to revise and reposition these courses through an active blended learning paradigm.
Reference82 articles.
1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529952.pdf
2. Three generations of distance education pedagogy
3. An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom
4. Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field.;Z. L.Berge;Educational Technology,1995
5. Transactional Distance Dialogic Interactions and Student Satisfaction in a Multi-Institutional Blended Learning Environment
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Purposefully-Designed and Mindfully-Facilitated Online Courses;Handbook of Research on Managing and Designing Online Courses in Synchronous and Asynchronous Environments;2022