The Role of Open Access in Enhancing Equitable Curricula and Research Outputs

Author:

Ford Angela Y.1,Alemneh Daniel Gelaw2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Judson University, USA

2. University of North Texas, USA

Abstract

When educators have difficulty accessing peer-reviewed research, it is inequitable to expect them to compete with educators who have access to a plethora of resources. Inequities have been a historically-identified educational problem; however, the forced online learning that occurred during COVID-19 restrictions amplified discrepancies experienced by tertiary educators. Scholars who were forced to work without strong information communication technologies infrastructure and who experienced limited access to online resources struggled more than those that had 24-hour uninhibited access. Education came to a near standstill for those that could not easily move their activities online. Prior to the pandemic, individuals working with curricula were already feeling handicapped by the lack of access. When physical libraries were closed, it became nearly impossible for many to move forward. This chapter explores the changing publishing paradigms, particularly the role of OA and how increasing open dissemination of scholarly outputs can reduce inequities in curricula and research activities.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference39 articles.

1. Social Justice in Scholarly Publishing: Open Access Is the Only Way

2. The moral economy of open access

3. Awareness of open access resources among the researchers of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.;S.Bala;International Journal of Library Information Network and Knowledge,2018

4. Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science. The Guardian, 27(7), 1-12. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

5. Closing the Opportunity Gap

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inclusive global scholarly communication: Toward a just and healthier information ecosystem;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2024-05-02

2. Scholars Experiencing Epistemic Injustice Due to Management of Scholarly Outputs;Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2022-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3