Affiliation:
1. Judson University, USA
2. University of North Texas, USA
Abstract
When educators have difficulty accessing peer-reviewed research, it is inequitable to expect them to compete with educators who have access to a plethora of resources. Inequities have been a historically-identified educational problem; however, the forced online learning that occurred during COVID-19 restrictions amplified discrepancies experienced by tertiary educators. Scholars who were forced to work without strong information communication technologies infrastructure and who experienced limited access to online resources struggled more than those that had 24-hour uninhibited access. Education came to a near standstill for those that could not easily move their activities online. Prior to the pandemic, individuals working with curricula were already feeling handicapped by the lack of access. When physical libraries were closed, it became nearly impossible for many to move forward. This chapter explores the changing publishing paradigms, particularly the role of OA and how increasing open dissemination of scholarly outputs can reduce inequities in curricula and research activities.
Reference39 articles.
1. Social Justice in Scholarly Publishing: Open Access Is the Only Way
2. The moral economy of open access
3. Awareness of open access resources among the researchers of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.;S.Bala;International Journal of Library Information Network and Knowledge,2018
4. Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science. The Guardian, 27(7), 1-12. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science
5. Closing the Opportunity Gap
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献