A Framework for Analyzing Structural Mechanisms Deployed to Support Traditional and Agile Methods

Author:

Dolezel Michal1ORCID,Buchalcevova Alena2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic

2. Department of Information Technologies, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

People rely on structures to make their worlds orderly. This chapter conceptually probes into the problem of the differences between organizational structures deployed in traditional and agile environments. The authors develop an argument that all common forms of organizational entities can be classified by involving a two-dimensional classification scheme. Specifically, they constructed a typology to examine the issues of formal vs. informal authority, and disciplinarity vs. cross-functionality in terms of their significance for traditional and agile software development workplaces. Some examples of concrete organizational forms—including traditional project team, independent test team, self-organizing agile team and developers' community of practice—are discussed. In sum, they argue that by employing this classification scheme, they can theorize the nature of the on-going structural shift observed in conjunction with deploying agile software development methods. They acknowledge that the structures have fundamentally changed, terming the move “democratization” in the software development workplace.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference76 articles.

1. Lateral Coordination Mechanisms and the Moderating Role of Arrangement Characteristics in Information Systems Development Outsourcing

2. Software development governance: A meta-management perspective.;P. L.Bannerman;ICSE Workshop on Software Development Governance (SDG),2009

3. Coordination in large-scale software teams.;A.Begel;ICSE Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects on Software Engineering (CHASE),2009

4. Coordination Challenges in Large-Scale Software Development: A Case Study of Planning Misalignment in Hybrid Settings

5. What to Expect From Agile.;J.Birkinshaw;MIT Sloan Management Review,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3