Affiliation:
1. Northcentral University, USA
Abstract
Using an illustrative case study, this chapter explores the two-year design process of a practice-based Doctor of Education degree program in an online university. Emerging from the continuous improvement lens, the redesign process centered around the examination of the purpose of the degree in the context of meeting the educational needs of practitioners in the field. Principally, this program redesign led to greater differentiation between the practitioner-based EdD degree and the PhD to provide students with distinct options for meeting their personal and professional goals.
Reference24 articles.
1. Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2019). The CPED framework. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework
2. Clowes, M. C., Shaw, M., & Throne, R. (2016, May 24-25). Enriching online doctoral advising using situated advising andragogy [Conference session]. 39th Teaching Public Administration Conference, Newark, NJ, USA. http://www.spaeaspa.org/TPAC2016/
3. Types of Case Studies
4. Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. Summary of Seminar Paper No. 204. Centre for Strategic Education. http://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396088160.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Leadership and Ethical Analysis of the Scholar-Practitioner;International Journal of Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making;2022-10-26