Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University, USA
Abstract
This chapter aims to revitalize the use of the Angoff method in measuring students' performance in the educational contexts by offering guidance on the constructivist learning perspective that is more appropriate for training K-12 teachers. Specifically, it compares the cognitive and social constructivist theories and the Completely Structured Training (CST) and Partially Structured Training (PST) designs for conducting training on the Angoff method. The analysis argues for the relative efficacy of the cognitive constructivist perspective of the CST based on a breakdown of the cognitive strategies of the Angoff method judgments over the social constructivist perspective of the PST that emphasizes interpersonal interactions. The chapter concludes with recommendations for empirical comparisons of the quality of judgments based on the CST and PST models.
Reference66 articles.
1. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores;W. H.Angoff;Educational measurement,1971
2. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes;R. C.Atkinson;The psychology of learning and motivation,1968
3. Working memory;A. D.Baddeley;The psychology of learning and motivation,1974
4. Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献