Affiliation:
1. University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Italy
Abstract
In contexts characterized by high ownership concentration, institutional investors may lose their monitoring role and might not be effective in constraining earnings management. So, this study investigates whether directors appointed by institutional shareholders are more effective in inhibiting earnings management for companies with a high ownership concentration, rather than the mere presence of institutional investors. Based on a sample of Italian listed companies, findings suggest a negative relationship between minority directors appointed by institutional shareholders and abnormal accruals, while no relationship is found between the latter and the mere presence of institutional investors. Moreover, results also highlight that the difference between strategic and no strategic institutional investors does not count in a context characterized by high ownership concentration. Overall, this study suggests that institutional investors, regardless of their characteristics, are more effective in constraining earnings management when they can count on an agent on the board of directors.
Reference65 articles.
1. Ownership structure and earnings management: Evidence from Portugal. Australasian Accounting;S.Alves;Business and Finance Journal,2012
2. Are Unmanaged Earnings Always Better for Shareholders?
3. Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment.;S.Bainbridge;Harvard Law Review,2006
4. R&D budgets and corporate earnings targets
5. The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience*
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献