Affiliation:
1. Bogazici University, Turkey
Abstract
If the aim of the EU is the establishment of deeper cooperation with other nations within the context of cyber security in the future, platforms (e.g., the Task Force) should create an effective agenda that reflects the differences between the EU (soft power) and other countries such as China or Russia (hard power). Yet, there should not be any compromise in the principles and norms of these countries with regard to their Internet policies. Although this may sound too difficult to accomplish, it is not impossible given EU's increased emphasis on cybersecurity along with its evolving cybersecurity strategy.
Reference34 articles.
1. Bendiek, A. (2014). Tests of Partnership: Transatlantic Cooperation in Cyber Security, Internet Governance and Data Protection. SWP Research Paper, RP5, March 2014, Berlin.
2. Bendrath, R., Eriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2010). From ‘cyberterrorism’ to ‘cyberwar’, back and forth: How the United States securitized cyberspace. In International Relations and Security in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
3. Brown, I., & Marsden, C. T. (2007). Co-regulating Internet Security: the London Action Plan. Retrieved in April 2016 from http://essex.academia.edu/ChrisMarsden/Papers/700007/Co-regulating_Internet_security_the_London_Action_Plan