Affiliation:
1. University of South Carolina, USA
2. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
3. Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Abstract
As an international team of scholars, we have individually and collectively encountered a range of summative and formative assessment practices. Some of these assessment practices have originated from other parts of the world as policy practices increasingly entail global borrowing. We open this chapter with two compelling views of childhood; one places the onus on leading, directing, and controlling children's learning; the other views learning as idiosyncratic, unpredictable, and stunningly contingent on each child's vision of the world. We then introduce readers to a summative assessment associated with three countries (Australia, South Africa, and the United States) to explore how the use of these assessments contributes to the proliferation of particular views of childhood. Finally, we discuss the use of three formative literacy assessments that have gained international attention and present alternative visions of childhood and literacy learning.
Reference57 articles.
1. Democratic education in neoliberal and neoconservative times
2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). The tests. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/the-tests
3. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2016). A vertical case study of global policy-making: Early grade literacy in Zambia. The Handbook of Global Education Policy, 554-572.
4. Teacher Proof
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5.