Reviewing the Components of Evaluation Methods

Author:

Abstract

The present research work consists of a revision of the main components of the evaluation methods, from the educational, technological, and scientific perspectives. It highlights the interrelation of mathematics, the media, and the social sciences in the generation of new educational paradigms. The advantage of diachronic and synchronic storytelling is also disclosed to confront historical and current realities in secular European institutions, which have an international projection and are aimed at education. Finally, the contributions of the formal, natural, and social sciences are investigated in the generation of evaluation methods, techniques, and instruments that range from usability engineering through user experience to the expansion of communicability.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference58 articles.

1. BadcockC. (2015). Lévi-Strauss: Structuralism and Sociological Theory. Routledge.

2. Bailey, R. (1992). Usability testing vs. Heuristic Evaluation: A Head-to-head comparison. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 409-413.

3. BenjafieldJ. (1993). Thinking Critically about Research Methods. Pearson Education.

4. Nine questions for HCI researchers in the making

5. Federated Learning and Privacy.;K.Bonawitz;Communications,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3