Affiliation:
1. Valdosta State University, USA
Abstract
Since the mid-1990s, zero tolerance policies have been utilized in K-12 education as a means of addressing and deterring acts of violence on school grounds. While originally designed to address serious infractions, such as possession of weapons and drugs in schools, these policies have been expanded to include less serious offenses, such as fighting, absences, and other minor disturbances. Critics argue that this punitive approach has not only led to the inconsistent use and application of these policies but has also been used as a means of forcing lower performing students and minorities out of school by criminalizing minor acts thereby creating a school-to-prison pipeline. Research has identified that these policies are ineffective and has had a detrimental impact on kids both in school and beyond, yet they are still popular. This chapter examines these various issues and harmful consequences of zero tolerance while offering recommendations for schools to implement restorative justice practices, or a similar philosophy, in their response to wrongdoings by students.
Reference43 articles.
1. American Bar Association Center on Children and The Law. (Feb. 2001). School Discipline “Zero Tolerance” Policies. Retrieved from http://americanbar.org/groups/child_law/tools_to_use/attorneys/school_disciplinezerotolerancepolicies.html
2. American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/info/reports/zero-tolerance.pdf
3. The Hidden Side of Zero Tolerance Policies: The African American Perspective