Affiliation:
1. Mimar Sinan Fine Art University, Turkey & Bahçeşehir University, Turkey
2. Bahçeşehir University, Turkey
Abstract
Evaluating multiple criteria and selecting and/or ranking alternatives is called Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). These methods which are considered important decision-making tools for decision makers due to their multidisciplinary nature have been developed over the years. As a result, there are many MCDM methods in the literature. In this chapter, TOPSIS and VIKOR, widely used in the literature, will be discussed. The major reason for examining these two methods is that the aggregating function used by both methods is similar because VIKOR method uses linear normalization and TOPSIS method uses vector normalization. The process of the methods is shown on a data set that includes the Human Development Index (HDI) indicators, which have been developed to measure the development levels of countries as well as the unemployment indicator. It was observed that the methods yielded similar results.
Reference25 articles.
1. On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies
2. Bernroider, E. W. N., & Stix, V. (2003). The Evaluation of ERP Systems Using Data Envelopment Analysis. The Proceedings CD of IRMA 2003- Information Resources Management Association International Conference, pp. 283-386.
3. PROMITHEE: A new family of outranking methods in MCDM.;J. P.Brans;Operations Research,1984
4. A Pro-performance appraisal system for the university
5. Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献