Institutional Capital on Trade Marketing and Environmentally-Sustainable Development Policy Making-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Institutional Capital on Trade Marketing and Environmentally-Sustainable Development Policy Making

Published:2020 Issue: Volume: Page:34-66
ISSN:2330-3271
Container-title:Interdisciplinary Approaches to Public Policy and Sustainability
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Vargas-Hernández José G.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University Center for Economic and Managerial Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Mexico

Abstract

The aim of this study is to critically analyze the implications in terms of the relationship between cooperation, conflict, and institutional capital, as well as their interactions with trade marketing and environmentally sustainable development policy making under the framework of NAFTA. The methodology is based on a literature review aimed to create a relationship between the analytical variables in order to obtain a research construct. This research model is used to critically analyze the implications in terms of cooperation and conflict relationships as institutional capital and their interactions with trade marketing and environmentally sustainable development policy making. It is concluded that, although the existence of NAFTA is severely questioned, its institutional capital has positive effects on the implications of trade-marketing; however, environmentally sustainable development proves to be conflictive and highly contentious, although some positive effects are developing.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference105 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.

2. Ahrens, J., & Jünemann, P. (2009). Adaptive efficiency and pragmatic flexibility: characteristics of institutional change in capitalism, Chinese-style. Retrieved from http://www.centralasiaproject.de/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=32&&Itemid=7

3. Institutional Capital and Poverty: A Transition Economy Perspective;S. M.Ahsan;Perspectives on poverty and growth. United nations University Press,2003

4. An, C. (2013). To Close Again or to Open Wider: The Sino-US Economic Interdependence and the Legal Environment for Foreign Investment in China After Tiananmen. In The Voice from China (pp. 453-466). Springer.

5. Ashby, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience. London, UK, Department for International Development.