Erosion by Standardisation

Author:

Christofi Athena1ORCID,Dewitte Pierre1ORCID,Ducuing Charlotte1ORCID,Valcke Peggy1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. KU Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

This chapter examines the interplay between the GDPR and parallel private regulation in the form of privacy-related standards adopted by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). Focusing on the understanding of ‘risks' in the GDPR and ISO respective ecosystems, it compares the GDPR requirement for Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) with ISO/IEC 29134:2017, a private standard on Privacy Impact Assessment explicitly referred to by EU Data Protection Authorities as relevant in the context of DPIA methods. The resulting gap analysis identifies and maps misalignments, critically reflecting on whether the parallel form of ISO regulation, in the context of DPIAs, could support or rather blurs GDPR's objective to protect fundamental rights by embracing a risks-based approach.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference48 articles.

1. Rules- or Principles-Based Regulation—Factors for Choosing the Best Language Strategy.;J. P.Allen;Canadian Business Law Journal,2014

2. Article 29 Working Party. (2009). Joint contribution to the Consultation of the European Commission on the legal framework for the fundamental right to protection of personal data. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2009/wp168_en.pdf

3. Article 29 Working Party. (2013). Statement of the Working Party on current discussions regarding the data protection reform package. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/other-document/files/2013/20130227_statement_dp_reform_package_en.pdf

4. Article 29 Working Party. (2014). Statement on the role of a risk-based approach in data protection legal frameworks, 14/EN WP 218.

5. Article 29 Working Party. (2017). Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and determining whether processing is “likely to result in a high risk” for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679—17/EN WP 248 rev.01.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3