New Boundaries for the Right to Be Forgotten?

Author:

Casarosa Federica1ORCID,Poletti Dianora2

Affiliation:

1. European University Institute, Italy

2. University of Pisa, Italy

Abstract

The right to be forgotten has come to the forefront of the academic debate as a reaction to Court of Justice's decision in case C-507/17 Google LLC c. CNIL concerning the issue of geographical extension of the delisting obligation. Along with the development of CJEU jurisprudence, national courts have developed their own caselaw interpreting and adapting the right to be forgotten, now included in art 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation, to the pre-existing legal framework. Italian courts, and in particular the Italian Supreme Court, have addressed in several occasions the features and facets of the right to be forgotten, and the recent decision of the Grand Chamber (n. 19681, 22 July 2019) is the last though not the least. Starting form this decision, the chapter will analyse how the Supreme Court has attempted to systematise the right to be forgotten distinguishing what is called the traditional application of the right from the ones emerging in the digital context.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference32 articles.

1. 2 Forgetting: In a Digital Glasshouse

2. Art 29 Working Party. (2014). Guidelines on the implementation of the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment on Google Spain and Inc v. Agencia española de protección de datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González C-131/12, 14/EN, WP 225. Retrieved from https://www.dataprotection.ro/servlet/ViewDocument?id=1080

3. De Amicis, G. (2018). La formulazione del principio di diritto e i rapporti tra Sezioni semplici e Sezioni Unite penali della Corte di Cassazione. Retrieved from http://www.cortedicassazione.it/cassazione-resources/resources/cms/documents/Rel.__Cons._DE_AMICIS-Il_principio_di_diritto_ed_i_rapporti_tra_Sez._simplici_e_Sez._Unite.pdf

4. Di Ciommo. (2019b). Diritto alla cancellazione, diritto di limitazione del trattamento e diritto all’oblio. I dati personali nel diritto europeo, 351-393.

5. Di Ciommo, F. (2018). Il diritto all'oblio nel Regolamento

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3