A Normative Practice Approach to Health Care

Author:

Glas Gerrit1

Affiliation:

1. Vrije Universiteit, The Netherlands

Abstract

This chapter explains how and why healthcare might profit from a normative practice approach (NPA). This approach sketches a conceptual and normative framework that helps to locate and identify relevant points of view for clinical practice as well as for policy making in healthcare. The chapter starts in medias res: in the consulting room, in the encounter between clinician and patient. What kinds of relations are relevant for the understanding of what is going in the patient who feels ill and between the patient and the doctor (or nurse)? Are there normative principles and values which guide these relationships? The focus then broadens to the meso- and macro-contexts of current medicine and healthcare. The NPA will be re-introduced. Its relevance is shown for topics like the increase in the administrative burden in medicine, the role of expert knowledge, the hospital and its purposes, and the changing focus of medicine given the rapid changes in the macro-sphere. The chapter ends by saying that the NPA may help in different ways: by taking it as a point of reference; by relating the different normative dimensions to core responsibilities of doctors, other employees, and stakeholders beside medical professionals; and by relating these core responsibilities to the relevant contexts in which these doctors, other employees, and stakeholders are working.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference16 articles.

1. The assault on the professions and the restructuring of academic and professional identities: a Bernsteinian analysis

2. Markets, information asymmetry and health care: Towards new social contracts

3. Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. W. (2006). The Complexities of Medical Professionalism: A preliminary investigation. In D. Wear, J.M. Aultman (Eds.), Professionalism in Medicine: Critical Perspectives (pp. 3–24). New York: Springer.

4. Skills for the new millenium: Report of the societal needs working group, CanMEDS 2000 Project.;J. R.Frank;Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada,1996

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Accountability as a virtue in medicine: from theory to practice;Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine;2023-03-22

2. Value Sensitive Design for autonomous weapon systems – a primer;Ethics and Information Technology;2023-02-11

3. Searching for the Anthropological Foundations of Economic Practice: Controversies and Opportunities;Relational Anthropology for Contemporary Economics;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3