Affiliation:
1. Texas A&M University, USA
Abstract
Engaged scholarship begins with the premise that academic research cannot only be rigorous, but also have social impact by addressing important organizational and community issues. A tacit assumption in much of the literature on engaged organizational communication scholarship is that we have a clear understanding of what we mean by social impact. This chapter explores how various indicators and metrics constitute the meaning of academic and social impact. I argue that there is relatively little overlap in the indicators that are currently used to assess academic and social impact and that this poses important challenges for organizational communication scholars who wish to do engaged scholarship. Five practices are offered to facilitate organizational communication scholars determine the kind of impact they wish to make and manage the challenges posed by the competing demands of demonstrating academic and social impact: (1) connect with your scholarly passion, (2) practice triple translation, (3) develop emergent design skills, (4) go big, and (5) research on the go.
Reference29 articles.
1. Communication as Design
2. Practical Ambivalence and Troubles in Translation
3. Designing Communication for the Day-to-Day Safety Oversight of Nuclear Power Plants
4. Barge, J. K., Barbour, J., Gesch-Karamanlidis, E., Shipley, J., Street, J., & Ziemer, J. (2015, November). Designing conversations for social change: Large group interventions to support interorganizational problem solving. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the National Communication Association, Las Vegas, NV.
5. Engaged Scholarship and the Creation of Useful Organizational Knowledge
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献