Affiliation:
1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Abstract
E-exams have different cheating opportunities and mitigations than paper exams, and remote exams also have different cheating risks that on-site exams. It is important to understand these differences in risk and possible mitigations against them. Authenticating the candidate may be a bigger challenge for remote exams, and biometric authentication has emerged as a key solution. This chapter delivers a categorization of different types of high-stakes assessments, different ways of cheating, and what types of cheating are most relevant for what types of assessments. It further presents an analysis of which threats biometric authentication can be effective against and what types of threats biometric authentication is less effective against. Insecure aspects of various biometric authentication approaches also indicate that biometric authentication and surveillance should be combined with other types of approaches (e.g., how questions are asked, timing of the exam) to mitigate cheating.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Comprehensive E-learning of Mathematics using the Halomda Platform enhanced with AI tools;Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences;2024-04
2. Detecting Fraudulent Student Communication in a Multiple Choice Online Test Environment;IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems;2024-02
3. Digital proctoring in higher education: a systematic literature review;International Journal of Educational Management;2023-08-17
4. E-assessment of mathematics courses using the Halomda platform;APPLICATIONS OF MATHEMATICS IN ENGINEERING AND ECONOMICS (AMEE’22): Proceedings of the 48th International Conference “Applications of Mathematics in Engineering and Economics”;2023
5. A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Based Online Exam Proctoring Systems for Abnormal Student Behaviour Detection;International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology;2022-07-05