Affiliation:
1. Oakland University, USA
Abstract
All academic libraries strive to have the highest quality collections which their acquisition budgets can support. However, the cost of quality resources continues to regularly increase, typically without corresponding increases in acquisition budgets. Additionally, print resources come with associated storage costs which are less tangible to measure than acquisition costs but which nonetheless have impact on overall library operations and expenditures. Storage and retention costs can have a substantial negative impact on general library usage, relevancy, and budget allocations. This chapter will focus on the management of retaining and weeding print monographs within the medium-sized public academic library and what a group of Michigan public academic libraries are doing to collectively address weeding and retention issues through the preliminary phase of a program called the Michigan Shared Print Initiative (MI-SPI).
Reference41 articles.
1. Myth of browsing: Academic library space in the age of Facebook.;D. A.Barklay;American Libraries,2010
2. Libraries and Learning: A History of Paradigm Change
3. Coping with the terrible twins.;S.Bosch;Library Journal,2012
4. Center for Michigan (2014). Getting to work: Opportunity and hurdles to prosperity in Michigan college value and affordability guide (Community Conversation Issue Guide). Ann Arbor, MI: The Center for Michigan.
5. From Collaborative Purchasing Towards Collaborative Discarding: The Evolution of the Shared Print Repository