Affiliation:
1. State University of New York at Oswego, USA
Abstract
After mass shootings, various claims makers enter the national discourse to understand why these events happen and how best to respond to them in respect to policy and prevention. Among these individuals is the President of the United States, who often offers commentary meant to unify the nation in the aftermath of such tragedy and calm the fears of a nervous public. The influence of presidential rhetoric has long been contested among scholars, though it has yet to be examined in the context of mass shootings. Accordingly, this chapter seeks to understand the nature of such responses to these events in respect to the language choices made by the President, the context in which these messages are framed, and how these contribute to a broader understanding of mass shootings. Remarks offered by presidents in response to mass shootings are analyzed for 32 attacks occurring between 1966 and 2014, with attention paid to patterns within and between the various presidents. Potential policy implications and a broader social contextualization of these commentaries also are explored.
Reference74 articles.
1. Affholter, P. (2006). Violent video games: Danger to children or protected free speech? State Notes, Topics of Legislative Interest. Retrieved from http://www.senate.michigan.gov/sfa/publications%5Cnotes%5C2006notes%5Cnotesmayjun06pa.pdf
2. Qualitative Media Analysis
3. Dimensions of Temporality in President Obama’s Tucson Memorial Address
4. Barnard, J. (1999, November 15). Mental illness set Kip Kinkel’s case apart from others like it. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19991115&slug=2995403
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献