The Impact of Digital Technologies in Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher Preparation Over Four Decades

Author:

Bush Sarah B.1,Driskell Shannon O.2,Niess Margaret L.3,Pugalee David4,Rakes Christopher R.5,Ronau Robert N.6

Affiliation:

1. Bellarmine University, USA

2. University of Dayton, USA

3. Oregon State University, USA

4. University of North Carolina – Charlotte, USA

5. University of Maryland – Baltimore County, USA

6. University of Cincinnati, USA

Abstract

The rapid expansion of technology integration in everyday lives calls for a rethinking of teaching and learning with current and emerging digital technologies. How have pre-service teachers been prepared for teaching with these new technologies? Are they prepared for this educational revolution? This chapter presents an analysis of the impact of digital technologies in mathematics pre-service teacher preparation over the past four decades. The chapter examines how various technology types, content strands, grade-level bands, teacher outcomes, conceptual frameworks, research questions, and alignment with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) (CCSSO, 2010) Mathematical Practices (CCSSM-MP) have influenced the outcomes from mathematics teacher education papers and how this literature has affected teacher preparation. The goal of this examination is to identify recommendations for future mathematics teacher preparation research that show promise for revising mathematics teacher preparation in this digital age.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference46 articles.

1. Adams, G. B., & White, J. D. (1994). Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: An assessment of methods and quality. Public Administration Review, 54, 565-576.

2. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2006). Preparing teachers to use technology to enhance the learning of mathematics: A position of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://amte.net/sites/all/themes/amte/resources/AMTETechnologyPositionStatement.pdf

3. Quality criteria of research perceived by academics in social sciences at higher education.;A.Bakioğlu;US-China Education Review,2009

4. Content Knowledge for Teaching

5. Chow, W. Y. (2012). Effective teachers and effective teaching. In E. Albro (Ed.), Request for applications: Education research grants. CFDA 305A (pp. 18-22). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Research. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from http://ies.ed.gov/funding/pdf/2013_84305A.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3