From Bibliometrics to Scientometrics

Author:

Abstract

The growing computational power facilitates much demanded comparative and relative study of publication output, journal impact, and collaborative publications. This significant growth of data, its availability, and easy access has given rise to the range of metrics and indicators which are applied at different levels of research assessment. These indicators are available to measure the quality and impact of the research output at individual, institutional, or national level. The availability of these indicators has highlighted their application depending upon the aim and subject of assessment and evaluation of research.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference64 articles.

1. Amount of research interest in rare and common neurological conditions: bibliometric study

2. All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences

3. Bornmann, L. (2016). Measuring Impact In Research Evaluations: A Thorough Discussion Of Methods For, Effects Of, And Problems With Impact Measurements. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1895

4. THE BRADFORD DISTRIBUTION

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3