Research-Based Strategies in an Electric Circuits Lab

Author:

Quezada-Espinoza Monica1,Zavala Genaro2

Affiliation:

1. Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico

2. Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico & Universidad Andres Bello, Chile

Abstract

This study reports the outcomes of comparing three methods to carry out a physics laboratory with active learning strategies: Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Tutorials) and RealTime Physics (RTP). A sample of 476 students was divided into three groups, about one third of the students used Tutorials, another third used RTP, and the last third used RTP with graphing calculators and probes. A multiple choice test was used to find that the three groups had statistically-significant differences on conceptual understanding of current concepts. Additionally, it was found differences in gains among the three groups using a multiple-choice pretest and posttest. With an analysis of misconceptions it was found that an important portion of students still holding misconceptions. The change of instruction seems to affect conceptual understanding when students have to analyze difficult circuits. Besides, it was found that students still holding misconceptions, they continue using terms like current and voltage interchangeably.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference46 articles.

1. Can one lab make a difference?

2. Video-Based Labs for Introductory Physics.;R. J.Beichner;Journal of College Science Teaching,1999

3. Enseñanza tradicional vs aprendizaje activo para alumnos de ingeniería.;Y.Benítez;Revista Cubana de Física,2010

4. Investigating Students’ Conceptions of Some Electricity Concepts.;E.Bilal;Latin American Journal of Physics Education,2009

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Difficult are Simple Electrical Circuit Conceptions? New Findings;European Journal of Educational Research;2023-07-15

2. Physics Education Research and the Development of Active Learning Strategies in Introductory Physics;The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Learning Physics;2023-03-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3