Affiliation:
1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA
2. Indiana University/Purdue University – Fort Wayne, USA
3. Motalen, Inc., USA
Abstract
What does the contemporary craft of character design (by human authors), which is beyond the reach of foreseeable AI, and which isn't powered by any stunning, speculative, AI-infused technology (immersive or otherwise), but is instead aided by tried-and-true “AI-less” software tools and immemorial techniques that are still routinely taught today, imply with respect to today's computational cognitive architectures? This chapter narrows the scope of this large question, and argues that at present, perhaps only the cognitive architecture CLARION can represent and reason over knowledge at a level of logical expressivity sufficient to capture such characters, along with the robust modeling implied by contemporary story and character design.
Reference48 articles.
1. 4-D/RCS reference model architecture for unmanned ground vehicles
2. Anderson, J. (1976). Formal semantics of ACT representations. In Language, Memory, and Thought (pp. 220-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
3. The Newell Test for a theory of cognition
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Logic-Based Modeling of Cognition;The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Sciences;2023-05-11
2. Cognitive Modeling Paradigms;The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Sciences;2023-05-11
3. Automated argument adjudication to solve ethical problems in multi-agent environments;Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics;2021-01-01
4. The Theory of Cognitive Consciousness, and Λ (Lambda);Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness;2020-08-14