Affiliation:
1. Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
Abstract
One of the key trends in the development of technoscience is associated with the NBIC-convergence projects, which create not only unprecedented means for transformation of society and human but also raise the risks that require integrated approaches to ethical assessment and examination. Today, the foundations of the “NBIC-tetrahedron” have ethical projections in the form of nanoethics, bioethics, ICT-ethics, and neuroethics. However, their ability to discuss and resolve complex problems is limited. Technoethics can be considered a relevant way of combining different approaches to the ethical issues of converging technologies and science to discuss and solve not only actual situations but prospects as well.
Reference29 articles.
1. Neuroethics and Nanoethics: Do We Risk Ethical Myopia?
2. Bainbridge, W. (2007). Governing Nanotechnology: Social, Ethical and Human Issues. In Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology (pp. 1823-1840). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
3. Decision ethics and emergent technologies: The case of nanotechnology.;D. M.Berube;European Journal of Law and Technology,2012
4. Budanov, V. G. (2015) Conceptual model of socio-anthropological projections of converging NBICS-technologies In Socio-anthropological resources transdisciplinary research in the context of innovative civilization: Collected papers of international scientific webinar. Kursk.